Massachusetts Police Brutality

More on the Cao execution #2

Basically, the Cao murder is a situation where there are dramatically conflicting claims and no trial. Jane has provided evidence, which proves that her husband could not possibly, have shot at Officer Gregory Burke. The police department has not even attempted to dispute the facts published by Jane Cao. The more you know about this case, the sicker you get. Most people, when faced with this much crap from society, would be knocked comatose by the government apathy. Not Jane Cao, she's actively and courageously fighting for justice even after the atrocities meted out by our fascist American police state (fascism puts the state above the individual). Even police that have long complained about my brutality site not being fair have admitted that Jane Cao has a case.

Since Jane only has the motive of truth and justice, and the police have the motive of keeping their jobs and staying out of jail, I have to believe Jane's testimony above that of the police and their cronies. The myth is that our criminal justice system is founded on the proposition that we prove criminal complaints to beyond a reasonable doubt. However, there is no evidence other than possibly/probably biased police testimony in this murder.

When the police shoot, they kill. The police shoot to kill so that there will be no witness to contradict his or her testimony. They are getting away with murder. There is at least one murder of an innocent person by police in each state each year that results either in no trial or acquittal. No police brutality will ever be prosecuted, unless we are first able to prosecute police murder.

Dr. Jane Cao wrote: My husband was a good man who loved all his children. This is a picture of him with his two daughters.

Here is my proud husband holding our baby.

Here is the once happy home where we lived.

Here is a picture of my husband after the police broke into our home without a warrant and shot him.

Police kill another Portage man on Thursday, November 29, 2001.

Dr. Jane Cao has been refused a trial on criminal charges for the officer that shot her husband. She has been denied the disclosure of police documents relating to the incident and most lawyers have refused to bring a civil suit against the police for monetary damages.

Amendment VII of the United States Constitution states that "In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. " It's hard to believe that the preceeding constitutional ammendment actually exists when you read the following letter from Jane Cao.

Dear Fred,

I appreciate you so much to keep my story at your web site and to help/direct me.

I am in contact of the lawyer representing the Sova family, Mr. Robert A. Dietz. Today I sent out all the reports I have to him.

Last Friday I met a lawyer interested in this case. But he told me: "Please do not make Debbie Denttler's life miserable." Debbie was the neighbor who gave witness words that she saw my husband went outside the door shooting at the police. I used some evidences in the police report and argued that Debbie was given false statements, e.g., she said that she did not see the officers draw their weapons. How could an officer not draw his weapon when they are breaking the house and then hearing gunshots inside the house. I would be scared to hire this lawyer.

I would let you know how it goes with Mr. Dietz.

Gratefully,

Jane Cao

Administrator's note: {The generous people of Massachusetts gave hundreds of thousands to support the family of a man murdered in a hockey rink. Jane has only received a few thousand dollars from the residents of MI. WAKE UP MICHIGAN!!!}

If you want to contribute, here is the address:

Dear Supporters:

Your monetary support is so crucial to the Cao family to bring justice to the police brutality victim, my husband Xianqing Cao. In reply to the posted message of "Chaosmaster", the donations could be sent to:

For LOVE OFFERINGS:

Jane Cao
7192 Bridlewood Circle
Portage, MI 49024

For LEGAL COSTS:

Cao Xianqing Legal Fund
P.O. Box 2227
Portage, MI 49081

The Cao family would use every penny of the love offering donations to bring justice to Xianqing Cao. Thank you for your support.

Gratefully with hope always,

Jane Cao

A letter from the Portage Police Department dated August 25th 2001 refused Jane the right to see police documents relevant to the murder of her husband by the police. The letter starts:

Dear Dr. Cao:

Re: Request for Portage Police Documents regarding KCSD Case No. 01-10035.

Your request for information falls under the "freedom of information act of 1976" guidelines. A review by the city attorney determined release of police procedures are exempt from disclosure {act no. 442, p.a. 1976, sec. 13(1)(b)(v), sec. 13 (1)(s)(v), sec. 13(1)(s)(vi).

Since you have been denied these documents, you are advised that you have the right to do either of the following … and goes on to suggest that an appeal be made.